Saturday, June 30, 2012
Money Speak the Truth
Saturday, June 16, 2012
THERE WAS…
Tuesday, June 12, 2012
Hollywood <>+=-?<>Bollywood and then to Drukpawood
Bhutanese take pride in three things: religion, culture, and tradition. These often come to the rescue of our identity and nationalism whenever intellectual debates arise from outside.
As a proud and real Bhutanese, I want my youth to absorb as much of Bhutanese culture as possible. But as luck would have it, none of the youth today show much interest in religion, culture, or tradition.
However, being a subservient son of Bhutan has its own perils. When I was thirteen, I watched Gasa Lamai Singye with my friends. It was Bhutan's first movie. To be honest, it was not about religion, culture, or tradition—it was about human bonds: a love triangle. There were a few fights (dishoom-dishoom) and some songs. The movie moved some of us to want to be like the heroes, and it entered our juvenile brains. It was no traditional or cultural film, I remember.
Today, when I look back at those days, a sense of nostalgia takes over. I can still recall the flicks of that movie. It marked the emergence of filmmaking in the country. I am not a Bhutanese movie buff. I watched Gasa Lamai Singye simply because there was no television at that time. Now, I am a type of "Wood"—Hollywood and Bollywood. I have watched only about seven Bhutanese movies so far. Therefore, I find Bhutanese movies a little un-Bhutanese: tactless, amateurish, sluggish, and predictable. They are all copycats. Bollywood copies Hollywood, Hollywood copies Bollywood, other "woods" copy each other, and then it trickles down to Drukpawood. Our Drukpawood is a mixed masala of all the Woods. Filmmakers think it will become a delicious emadatshi—and that because of this tasty emadatshi, our Drukpawood could match international standards. So we copy. But otherwise, it is the same commonly tasted flavor. Our Dzongkha is becoming Dzonglish. Anyway, let us consider this: Fiji, a country smaller than Bhutan, produces some of the world's best movies.
Most of our Bhutanese movies do not depict the rich history of our country—its historical background and traditions. We had so many Penlops, Deps, legends, myths, and folktales that could be made into very good films. For example, the legend of Ling Gesar Gyap, Zhabdrung and his Dzongs, and many others could become beautiful movies. But nowadays—yes, nowadays—we live in a floating world. So we see in our movies flashy cars, immaculate houses, decked-up ladies in tatters, fancy mood lighting—all flesh and bones—and it is difficult to understand what is being portrayed and why.
Some film directors look like rocky rock. Take Tshering Wangyel, for instance—his girlish hair and the blackest spectacles. Whatever he may be, people love his direction and his films.
![]() |
| Photo credit: Facebook ( |
Bhutanese movies are very much threaded in misery and a weepy kind of life, with few sparkling moments of joy that bring a smile to the viewer's face. The scene in which Phurba Thinley tries to behave like a woman gives little guffaws, or the westernized musical party where kids gather, dance, and sing "Nga Chelu Ga, Che NgaLu Ga" or a "ting-a-ling-ling" song. Otherwise, there is no striking moment in the movie. Consider the scene where Singlam and Galam go to see their old ruined house and break apart; or the cruel mother-in-law, Aum Lamo, who crushes the head of the hero's girlfriend and thrashes her against the wall; or the scenes of heroes running through poverty and dejection—usually because of the lady they love—gripping lives, until finally they understand each other's hearts, come together, and start a new life, which succeeds within a minute of screen time. Most of the time, the films tighten the knots of brutal and faithless life, making audiences—especially Bhutanese women—believe their own lives are just like the films.
Films must excite, startle, thrill, and shake viewers. These effects cannot be produced by a play that lacks conflict. The conflict in a movie may be between human beings pulling in different directions, between a character and the environment he finds himself in, or the society of which he is a member. Movies must generally represent human suffering, which raises pity and fear among audiences and makes them decide that the film is great in its tragic appeal. The misfortune in the film should be simple and straightforward, but sublime and universal in its penetrative appeal.
A good film, by my judgment, should represent human suffering, evoke fear and pity, use embellished language, and have an emotional or cathartic appeal. Above all, it should educate, entertain, and inform. There are two views on the tragic vision of life. One is that man is the plaything of an inscrutable power called fate. The other is that character is responsible for the tragic end. In Greek tragedies, the tragic fate of the heroes is predetermined. Oedipus and Antigone become obstinate and tyrannical. Their tragedy comes from their overconfidence in their respective attitudes.
Though films portray the antinomies of our lives, the majority of our viewers take them as reality. Because of this, films should touch on various themes and issues—not only love failures, which dominate most of our Bhutanese films. Films must also represent history, contemporary Bhutanese society, roles, changing relationships, and educate viewers about the morals of faith and believing.
Thursday, June 7, 2012
The Wait
Monday, June 4, 2012
On Her Majesty’s Birthday(May You Be Blessed)
![]() |
| The Queen of Bhutan |

