People often summarize that every Tom, Dick, and Harry can teach. Which is hilarious, because most Toms, Dicks, and Harrys I know can barely hammer the nail correctly, let alone handle thirty restless children armed with questions. Such a statement fails to recognize what truly makes a teacher. There are those who merely go through the motions and those who truly teach. There are teachers who follow only their lesson plans and those who plan their lessons for meaningful teaching—and then there are those who lose their lesson plans entirely and fake it till recess.
Sometimes, educationists themselves unfairly stereotype their own colleagues. For example, some of my previous heads—who otherwise could have been inspiring—have made obscure remarks like, "Anyone can teach." Such comments make teachers feel unsteady and morally disheartened. A good teacher who wholeheartedly teaches effectively in the classroom, using a variety of instructional materials and teaching approaches, and who strives to change each student's life for the better, is categorized alongside those who do not even attend their classes. Yes, because showing up and changing lives is clearly the same as not showing up at all.
I believe this leads to unrefined, unpolished, and raw teaching. The entire process becomes casual, and in the end, the teacher loses his or her good rapport with students, the school, and the community. Also their will to live, but that's another paragraph.
In Bhutanese culture and traditions, and according to our religious perspectives, teachers were always held in high esteem. They were looked upon as moral guides and as geniuses by society. This reverence, however, had an adverse effect on the quality of education. Wait, let me read that again—too much respect was the problem? That's like saying too much cake ruined my diet. This reverence has now disappeared. Some see this as an outcome of development and changing times. The credit goes to individual achievement, and we forget who shaped and molded our lives. We must respect a person for what they do, not for what they have. The nation sometimes never asks who is behind the shaping and building of its citizens. It’s the person who spent their Sunday evening grading your grammar.
I would therefore argue, briefly but firmly, that teachers should have space—good space. Not the cramped, dusty corner near the supply closet. Real space. They are the ones who clean the muddy channels and drain them to create a good space for every individual. Which is poetic, but also—have you seen a staff room?
Teachers must be uplifted and preferred, for they are never relieved of their responsibilities, even during vacations. Besides daily lesson plans and eight hours of teaching, there are paper corrections, assessments, and numerous activities lined up: sports, cultural events, SUPW, literary events, and so on. The list goes on. Teachers are parents, guides, exemplars, and more. They must remain in formal dress and maintain discipline throughout their lives. It is more work, less reward. Ideally, exclusive teaching should be a teacher's only job. Currently, it's teaching, counseling, parenting, mediating, first-aiding, and occasionally finding a lost shoe.
A teacher is seen as a silent and very small entity in the kingdom of various jobs. Gradually, the idea that "everyone can teach" is shockingly accepted as unquestionably true and legitimate by many people. Which is odd, because the same people panic at the thought of explaining fractions to a nine-year-old. If we look at ourselves judiciously, the teacher is on exhibition, observed daily by thousands of curious, imitating eyes called students. No pressure. Teachers, therefore, must have great personalities. They are paragons, like our great leaders. Also like our great leaders, they are expected to smile while being exhausted.
The school is a microcosm of society, and teachers are the spirit within it. They are governed by a strong adherence to a code of conduct and ethics. And coffee. Mostly coffee.
Besides imparting knowledge and information, a teacher makes the world a better place to live in. A good teacher is a philosopher who understands life and provides leadership in society. Also knows where the extra chalk is hidden. Do not underestimate this power.
A teacher is a master of teaching and, at the same time, possesses fundamental knowledge of all subjects. John Adams said, "The verb 'to teach' governs two accusatives—the subject and the pupils." John clearly never had to teach on a Friday afternoon before a holiday.
Teaching demands high intelligence and intellectual curiosity. A teacher should reason, tackle problems, and solve them successfully. For example: how to get thirty children to sit still after lunch. Still unsolved.
For these reasons, a teacher should be fluent in expression and also good in writing. A teacher is always enthusiastic in three ways: in child study, in their subject, and in matters of method—because they live with these every day. Also enthusiastic about the final bell. Very enthusiastic.
Teaching is a deliberate, intentional act requiring strong professional and personal qualities. Does a teacher receive professional enhancement from time to time? Not often. A teacher supplements the role of parents at school. A teacher's influence lasts eternally, and their effects are always constructive, bringing about social change—and occasionally, a decent exam result.
In short, a teacher advises, guides, and teaches. A teacher is the most useful tool in their social life—trustworthy, qualified, hardworking, intelligent, cooperative, disciplined, and helpful to the school's students, administration, and society as a whole. Also underpaid, overworked, and somehow still expected to be cheerful about it. But sure. Anyone can teach.